waterreuseteatree2.jpg (330310 bytes)Water recycling & reuse - 2004

Tea Tree Trial Bomaderry

Home | Human Settlement | Water Supply & Sewage Management | Water Recycling & Reuse | 2004

Indicator description                                                      

What does the Data tell us for 2000/2004

Northern Shoalhaven Reclaimed Water Management Scheme (REMS)

Operational Highlights

Farm Monitoring Program

REMS Stage 1B

Northern Shoalhaven Reclaimed Water Management Scheme (REMS)

The Northern Shoalhaven Reclaimed Water Management Scheme (REMS) has been developed to provide a long-term beneficial approach to wastewater management in the Shoalhaven. Reclaimed Water (treated wastewater) is tertiary treated including filtration and chlorine disinfection. The aim of the Scheme is to reuse an average of 80% of reclaimed water produced with surpluses released to the ocean at Penguin Head. Scheme water is currently supplied to sixteen properties including dairy farms, golf courses and sporting grounds.

REMS Stage 1A construction was completed in 2003 and includes Callala, Vincentia, Culburra Beach and St Georges Basin Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs). From October 2001 reclaimed water from St Georges Basin and Vincentia WWTPs has been transferred to the REMS distribution facilities at Coonemia allowed releases to Jervis Bay to be stopped.

Figure 58 - Northern REMS and WwTPs

 TOP

Operational Highlights

Volumes Reused - In the first two and one-half years of REMS operations, in excess of 4,100,000,000 litres (4,100 megalitres) have been recycled onto land or 76% of the reclaimed water managed within the Scheme.  Approximately 1,300 megalitres was released to the ocean from the Scheme.

Reclaimed Water Quality – Scheme water quality has been of a consistently high standard and fully complies with environmental and irrigation water quality targets. A high level of disinfection is also being achieved. This level of quality will allow reclaimed water to be used in a wide variety of applications in the future.

Impact on Jervis Bay – In excess of 3,700 megalitres of reclaimed water has not been released into Jervis Bay as a result of REMS. This has resulted in 19 tonnes less of nitrogen 7 tonnes less of phosphorus and 30 tonnes less suspended solids being released into the Bay.

Ocean Release Monitoring – Possible impacts of reclaimed water releases to the ocean have been studied since 1995. A range of ocean hydrology and ecological studies were undertaken in 2003 following an extended ocean release from REMS. Given the improved level of wastewater treatment in REMS, there has not been any increase in pollutant loads released to the ocean on a daily or annual basis when compared with the previous situation where Culburra Beach WWTP discharged on a daily basis to Penguin Head. The ecological studies have generally shown minimal or no detectable impact at the Penguin Head release site when compared to three reference sites in the area. The ecological study’s (MHL, 2004) main conclusion was:

  “Considering all ecological studies undertaken at Penguin Head since 1995 and including the current [2003] result, any detected effects of release have occurred over small scales and are considered to represent small, environmentally acceptable effects

Further major investigations will occur when there are significant changes to REMS ocean release patterns.

Groundwater monitoring – The Scheme has now collected three years worth of groundwater height and quality data from 13 bores in the main REMS irrigation area and bulk storage site. The data collected does not indicate any significant change to local water table heights or quality since irrigation began in December 2001.

 TOP

Farm Monitoring Program

As there was some uncertainty regarding the environmental and financial outcomes of REMS irrigation on the Shoalhaven floodplain, a two-year survey program was initiated at the commencement of supply to farms in late 2001. This survey involved collecting data from three irrigated and three adjacent non-irrigated farms on a monthly basis. Key findings of the two-year survey were:

  • 730mm of reclaimed water was applied to irrigated paddocks (over two years)
  • Soil moisture deficit reduced from 40% (dryland) to 10% (irrigated)
  • Irrigated dairy farms utilised 20% more of their feed from pasture and carried more stock per hectare
  • There were no significant differences in milk quality, animal health or soil quality between irrigated and non-irrigated farms

The average irrigated farm was estimated to be $50,000 to $70,000 better off financially over the two years.  Farms also saved around $2,000 from the fertiliser content in reclaimed water and $5,000 in town water charges by switching to reclaimed water for washing down yards and pens. The financial benefits of REMS to the Shoalhaven region in the first two years of operation were estimated to be between $2.4 and $3.2 million including value-adding at the Bomaderry milk factory.

The operations of REMS are governed by an Environment Protection Licence and operational issues are periodically reviewed by the REMS Management Advisory Board and the REMS Monitoring Review Group which consist of community and stakeholder representatives.

 TOP

REMS Stage 1B

The REMS will be expanded to include management of reclaimed water produced from the Nowra and Bomaderry WwTPs. Both treatment plants are to be expanded, upgraded and linked to the REMS distribution system. Concept design work for REMS Stage 1B is underway in conjunction with the NSW Department of Commerce. It is expected REMS Stage 1B will be completed in 2007/08.

 

Graph 160 - Water Recycling & Re-Use 2000-2004

TOP

Home | Human Settlement | Water Supply & Sewage Management | Water Recycling & Reuse | 2004